Bob Stone Bob Stone's Page de profil

Bob Stone Bob Stone

0 Cours inscrits • 0 Cours terminé

Biographie

100% Pass 2025 Palo Alto Networks Trustable PSE-Strata-Pro-24: Exam Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Questions Pdf

In the past ten years, we always hold the belief that it is dangerous if we feel satisfied with our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 study engine and stop renovating. Luckily, we still memorize our initial determination. We are proud that our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 learning questions are so popular in the market. Please remember that all experiences will become your valuable asset in life. And it is never too late to learn more and something new. Just buy our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Braindumps, you will find that you can reach your dream easily.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Business Value and Competitive Differentiators: This section of the exam measures the skills of Technical Business Value Analysts and focuses on identifying the value proposition of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs). Candidates will assess the technical business benefits of tools like Panorama and SCM. They will also recognize customer-relevant topics and align them with Palo Alto Networks' best solutions. Additionally, understanding Strata’s unique differentiators is a key component of this domain.

Topic 2

Deployment and Evaluation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Deployment Engineers and focuses on identifying the capabilities of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. Candidates will evaluate features that protect against both known and unknown threats. They will also explain identity management from a deployment perspective and describe the proof of value (PoV) process, which includes assessing the effectiveness of NGFW solutions.

Topic 3

Network Security Strategy and Best Practices: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Strategy Specialists and highlights the importance of the Palo Alto Networks five-step Zero Trust methodology. Candidates must understand how to approach and apply the Zero Trust model effectively while emphasizing best practices to ensure robust network security.

Topic 4

Architecture and Planning: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Architects and emphasizes understanding customer requirements and designing suitable deployment architectures. Candidates must explain Palo Alto Networks' platform networking capabilities in detail and evaluate their suitability for various environments. Handling aspects like system sizing and fine-tuning is also a critical skill assessed in this domain.

>> Exam PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Questions Pdf <<

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Reliable Braindumps Free | Exam PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Dumps

If you prefer to study by your mobile phone, our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 study materials also can meet your demand, because our learning system can support all electronic equipment. You just need to download the online version of our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 preparation questions, and you can use our products by any electronic equipment. We can promise that the online version will not let you down. We believe that you will benefit a lot from it if you buy our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Study Materials.

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q12-Q17):

NEW QUESTION # 12
While responding to a customer RFP, a systems engineer (SE) is presented the question, "How do PANW firewalls enable the mapping of transactions as part of Zero Trust principles?" Which two narratives can the SE use to respond to the question? (Choose two.)

A. Emphasize Zero Trust as an ideology, and that the customer decides how to align to Zero Trust principles.
B. Reinforce the importance of decryption and security protections to verify traffic that is not malicious.
C. Explain how the NGFW can be placed in the network so it has visibility into every traffic flow.
D. Describe how Palo Alto Networks NGFW Security policies are built by using users, applications, and data objects.

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
The question asks how Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Strata Hardware Firewalls enable the mapping of transactions as part of Zero Trust principles, requiring a systems engineer (SE) to provide two narratives for a customer RFP response. Zero Trust is a security model that assumes no trust by default, requiring continuous verification of all transactions, users, and devices-inside and outside the network. The Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW), part of the Strataportfolio, supports this through its advanced visibility, decryption, and policy enforcement capabilities. Below is a detailed explanation of why options B and D are the correct narratives, verified against official Palo Alto Networks documentation.
Step 1: Understanding Zero Trust and Transaction Mapping in PAN-OS
Zero Trust principles, as defined by frameworks like NIST SP 800-207, emphasize identifying and verifying every transaction (e.g., network flows, application requests) based on context such as user identity, application, and data. For Palo Alto Networks NGFWs, "mapping of transactions" refers to the ability to identify, classify, and control network traffic with granular detail, enabling verification and enforcement aligned with Zero Trust.
The PAN-OS operating system achieves this through:
* App-ID: Identifies applications regardless of port or protocol.
* User-ID: Maps IP addresses to user identities.
* Content-ID: Inspects and protects content, including decryption for visibility.
* Security Policies: Enforces rules based on these mappings.

NEW QUESTION # 13
A systems engineer (SE) has joined a team to work with a managed security services provider (MSSP) that is evaluating PAN-OS for edge connections to their customer base. The MSSP is concerned about how to efficiently handle routing with all of its customers, especially how to handle BGP peering, because it has created a standard set of rules and settings that it wants to apply to each customer, as well as to maintain and update them. The solution requires logically separated BGP peering setups for each customer. What should the SE do to increase the probability of Palo Alto Networks being awarded the deal?

A. Collaborate with the MSSP to create an API call with a standard set of routing filters, maps, and related actions, then the MSSP can call the API whenever they bring on a new customer.
B. Establish with the MSSP the use of vsys as the better way to segregate their environment so that customer data does not intermingle.
C. Confirm to the MSSP that the existing virtual routers will allow them to have logically separated BGP peering setups, but that there is no method to handle the standard criteria across all of the routers.
D. Work with the MSSP to plan for the enabling of logical routers in the PAN-OS Advanced Routing Engine to allow sharing of routing profiles across the logical routers.

Answer: D

Explanation:
To address the MSSP's requirement for logically separated BGP peering setups while efficiently managing standard routing rules and updates, Palo Alto Networks offers theAdvanced Routing Engineintroduced in PAN-OS 11.0. The Advanced Routing Engine enhances routing capabilities, including support forlogical routers, which is critical in this scenario.
Why A is Correct
* Logical routers enable the MSSP to create isolated BGP peering configurations for each customer.
* The Advanced Routing Engine allows the MSSP to share standard routing profiles (such as filters, policies, or maps) across logical routers, simplifying the deployment and maintenance of routing configurations.
* This approach ensures scalability, as each logical router can handle the unique needs of a customer while leveraging shared routing rules.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
* B:While using APIs to automate deployment is beneficial, it does not solve the need for logically separated BGP peering setups. Logical routers provide this separation natively.
* C:While virtual routers in PAN-OS can separate BGP peering setups, they do not support the efficient sharing of standard routing rules and profiles across multiple routers.
* D:Virtual systems (vsys) are used to segregate administrative domains, not routing configurations. Vsys is not the appropriate solution for managing BGP peering setups across multiple customers.
Key Takeaways:
* PAN-OS Advanced Routing Engine with logical routers simplifies BGP peering management for MSSPs.
* Logical routers provide the separation required for customer environments while enabling shared configuration profiles.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 11.0 Advanced Routing Documentation

NEW QUESTION # 14
What are three valid Panorama deployment options? (Choose three.)

A. With a cloud service provider (AWS, Azure, GCP)
B. As a dedicated hardware appliance (M-100, M-200, M-500, M-600)
C. As a container (Docker, Kubernetes, OpenShift)
D. As a virtual machine (ESXi, Hyper-V, KVM)
E. On a Raspberry Pi (Model 4, Model 400, Model 5)

Answer: A,B,D

Explanation:
Panorama is Palo Alto Networks' centralized management solution for managing multiple firewalls. It supports multiple deployment options to suit different infrastructure needs. The valid deployment options are as follows:
* Why "As a virtual machine (ESXi, Hyper-V, KVM)" (Correct Answer A)?Panorama can be deployed as a virtual machine on hypervisors like VMware ESXi, Microsoft Hyper-V, and KVM. This is a common option for organizations that already utilize virtualized infrastructure.
* Why "With a cloud service provider (AWS, Azure, GCP)" (Correct Answer B)?Panorama is available for deployment in the public cloud on platforms like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. This allows organizations to centrally manage firewalls deployed in cloud environments.
* Why "As a dedicated hardware appliance (M-100, M-200, M-500, M-600)" (Correct Answer E)?
Panorama is available as a dedicated hardware appliance with different models (M-100, M-200, M-500, M-600) to cater to various performance and scalability requirements. This is ideal for organizations that prefer physical appliances.
* Why not "As a container (Docker, Kubernetes, OpenShift)" (Option C)?Panorama is not currently supported as a containerized deployment. Containers are more commonly used for lightweight and ephemeral services, whereas Panorama requires a robust and persistent deployment model.
* Why not "On a Raspberry Pi (Model 4, Model 400, Model 5)" (Option D)?Panorama cannot be deployed on low-powered hardware like Raspberry Pi. The system requirements for Panorama far exceed the capabilities of Raspberry Pi hardware.

NEW QUESTION # 15
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?

A. It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems.
B. It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work.
C. It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it.
D. It can be addressed with BGP confederations.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Segregating a network into unique BGP environments requires the ability to configure separateeBGP autonomous systems(AS) within the NGFW. Palo Alto Networks firewalls support advanced BGP features, including the ability to create and manage multiple autonomous systems.
* Why "It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems" (Correct Answer B)?
PAN-OS supports the configuration of multiple eBGP AS environments. By creating unique eBGP AS numbers for different parts of the network, traffic can be segregated and routed separately. This feature is commonly used in multi-tenant environments or networks requiring logical separation for administrative or policy reasons.
* Each eBGP AS can maintain its own routing policies, neighbors, and traffic segmentation.
* This approach allows the NGFW to address the customer's need for segregated internal BGP environments.
* Why not "It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it" (Option A)?This statement is incorrect because PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, and features like route reflectors, confederations, and autonomous systems.
* Why not "It can be addressed with BGP confederations" (Option C)?While BGP confederations can logically group AS numbers within a single AS, they are generally used to simplify iBGP designs in very large-scale networks. They are not commonly used for segregating internal environments and are not required for the described use case.
* Why not "It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work" (Option D)?Full mesh iBGP is only required in environments without route reflectors. The described scenario does not mention the need for iBGP full mesh; instead, it focuses on segregated environments, which can be achieved with eBGP.

NEW QUESTION # 16
A systems engineer (SE) is working with a customer that is fully cloud-deployed for all applications. The customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs but describes the following challenges:
"Our apps are in AWS and Azure, with whom we have contracts and minimum-revenue guarantees. We would use the built-in firewall on the cloud service providers (CSPs), but the need for centralized policy management to reduce human error is more important." Which recommendations should the SE make?

A. Cloud NGFWs at both CSPs; provide the customer a license for a Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems.
B. VM-Series firewalls in both CSPs; manually built Panorama in the CSP of choice on a host of either type: Palo Alto Networks provides a license.
C. VM-Series firewall and CN-Series firewall in both CSPs; provide the customer a private-offer Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems.
D. Cloud NGFWs in AWS and VM-Series firewall in Azure; the customer selects a PAYG licensing Panorama deployment in their CSP of choice.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The customer is seeking centralized policy management to reduce human error while maintaining compliance with their contractual obligations to AWS and Azure. Here's the evaluation of each option:
* Option A: Cloud NGFWs at both CSPs; provide the customer a license for a Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems
* Cloud NGFW is a fully managed Next-Generation Firewall service by Palo Alto Networks, offered in AWS and Azure marketplaces. It integrates natively with the CSP infrastructure, making it a good fit for customers with existing CSP agreements.
* Panorama, Palo Alto Networks' centralized management solution, can be deployed as a virtual appliance in the CSP marketplace of choice, enabling centralized policy management across all NGFWs.
* This option addresses the customer's need for centralized management while leveraging their existing contracts with AWS and Azure.
* This option is appropriate.
* Option B: Cloud NGFWs in AWS and VM-Series firewall in Azure; the customer selects a PAYG licensing Panorama deployment in their CSP of choice
* This option suggests using Cloud NGFW in AWS but VM-Series firewalls in Azure. While VM- Series is a flexible virtual firewall solution, it may not align with the customer's stated preference for CSP-managed services like Cloud NGFW.
* This option introduces a mix of solutions that could complicate centralized management and reduce operational efficiency.
* This option is less appropriate.
* Option C: VM-Series firewalls in both CSPs; manually built Panorama in the CSP of choice on a host of either type: Palo Alto Networks provides a license
* VM-Series firewalls are well-suited for cloud deployments but require more manual configuration compared to Cloud NGFW.
* Building a Panorama instance manually on a host increases operational overhead and does not leverage the customer's existing CSP marketplaces.
* This option is less aligned with the customer's needs.
* Option D: VM-Series firewall and CN-Series firewall in both CSPs; provide the customer a private-offer Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems
* This option introduces both VM-Series and CN-Series firewalls in both CSPs. While CN-Series firewalls are designed for Kubernetes environments, they may not be relevant if the customer does not specifically require container-level security.
* Adding CN-Series firewalls may introduce unnecessary complexity and costs.
* This option is not appropriate.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Cloud NGFW
* Panorama overview in Palo Alto Knowledge Base
* VM-Series firewalls deployment guide in CSPs: Palo Alto Documentation

NEW QUESTION # 17
......

The Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification offers the quickest, easiest, and least expensive way to upgrade your knowledge. Everyone can participate in the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam after completing the prerequisite and passing the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Certification Exam easily. The NewPassLeader is offering top-notch Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam practice questions for quick Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam preparation.

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Reliable Braindumps Free: https://www.newpassleader.com/Palo-Alto-Networks/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-exam-preparation-materials.html

Cart Total Items (0)

Panier

Cours